a quantitative analysis of lexical similarities in tabarsi’s tafsir e majmaulbayan: synonymy, antonymy and homophone

نویسندگان

سید حیدر شیرازی

جامعة خلیج فارس فاطمه حاجی زاده

جامعة خلیج فارس

چکیده

the study of lexical similarities is one of the most important issues in religious text interpretation without which the comprehension of the holy quran is almost impossible. this domain of scholarship dates back to the beginning of the islamic era, and great scholars, before and after tabarsi, have taken it into consideration. the number of quranic homophones and similarities in some books published up to the ninth century have been fully studied statistically. however, majmaulbayan of tabarasi, which has dealt with them more comprehensively has not been given due attention. the present study investigated various cases of linguistic similarity in majmaulbayan as well as the related lexical meanings. similarity here does not mean homophones, where two or more different forms have the same pronunciation but different meanings. rather, it means synonyms, where different words have similar meanings. in expressing similarities, tabarsi used various terms such as ‘motaqarebatulmaani’ (having similar meanings), ‘alamaaniwahid’(single meaning ), ‘misl’(similar ), and ‘shabih’( similar). when he wanted to refer to homophones, he mentioned homonymy without saying anything about similarities, while other scholars used homonyms together with other similarities in the sense of homophones. as for similarity in the sense of synonymy, tabarsi did not believe in total synonymy, and he referred to lexical differences as ‘farq’ or ‘foruq’ (differences). in this case, he followed abuhalal askari.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Axiomatic Characterization of Synonymy and Antonymy

This work is a con t inua t ion o f research repor ted in the paper Mathematical Models o f S ~ n o n ~ , which was presented a t the 1965 I n t e r n a t i o n a l Conference on Computational L i n g u i s t i c s . That paper p resen ted a h i s t o r i c a l summary of the concepts of synonymy and antonyms. I t was noted t h a t s ince the f i r s t book on Engl ish synoD S , which appeared ...

متن کامل

a contrastive analysis of concord and head parameter in english and azerbaijani

این پایان نامه به بررسی و مقایسه دو موضوع مطابقه میان فعل و فاعل (از نظر شخص و مشار) و هسته عبارت در دو زبان انگلیسی و آذربایجانی می پردازد. اول رابطه دستوری مطابقه مورد بررسی قرار می گیرد. مطابقه به این معناست که فعل مفرد به همراه فاعل مفرد و فعل جمع به همراه فاعل جمع می آید. در انگلیسی تمام افعال، بجز فعل بودن (to be) از نظر شمار با فاعلشان فقط در سوم شخص مفرد و در زمان حال مطابقت نشان میدهند...

15 صفحه اول

Computer Aided Research on Synonymy and Antonymy

This research is a continuation of that reported in Axiomatic Characterization of Synonymy and Antonymy, which was presented at the 1967 International Conference on Computational Linguistics [3]. In that paper on mathematical linguistics the relations of synonymy and antonymy were regarded as ternary relations and their domains and ranges were discussed. Synonymy and antonymy were defined joint...

متن کامل

Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based perspective on synonymy and antonymy*

1 Introduction 1.1 Two empirical perspectives in the study of synonymy and antonymy The domain of linguistics that has arguably been studied most from a corpus-linguistic perspective is lexical, or even lexicographical, semantics. Already the early work of pioneers such as Firth and Sinclair has paved the way for the study of lexical items, their distribution, and what their distribution reveal...

متن کامل

Semantic Relations and the Lexicon Antonymy, Synonymy, and Other Paradigms

pub lished b y the press syndicate of the university of camb ridge A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data Murphy, M. Lynne. Semantic relations and the lexicon: antonymy, synonymy, and other paradigms / M. Lynne Murphy. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.

متن کامل

Homophone effects in lexical decision.

The role of phonology in word recognition was investigated in 6 lexical-decision experiments involving homophones (e.g., MAID-MADE). The authors' goal was to determine whether homophone effects arise in the lexical-decision task and, if so, in what situations they arise, with a specific focus on the question of whether the presence of pseudohomophone foils (e.g., BRANE) causes homophone effects...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
دراسات فی اللغه العربیه و آدابها

جلد ۵، شماره ۱۸، صفحات ۹۵-۱۱۸

کلمات کلیدی
the study of lexical similarities is one of the most important issues in religious text interpretation without which the comprehension of the holy quran is almost impossible. this domain of scholarship dates back to the beginning of the islamic era and great scholars before and after tabarsi have taken it into consideration. the number of quranic homophones and similarities in some books published up to the ninth century have been fully studied statistically. however majmaulbayan of tabarasi which has dealt with them more comprehensively has not been given due attention. the present study investigated various cases of linguistic similarity in majmaulbayan as well as the related lexical meanings. similarity here does not mean homophones where two or more different forms have the same pronunciation but different meanings. rather it means synonyms where different words have similar meanings. in expressing similarities tabarsi used various terms such as ‘motaqarebatulmaani’ (having similar meanings) ‘alamaaniwahid’(single meaning ) ‘misl’(similar ) and ‘shabih’( similar). when he wanted to refer to homophones he mentioned homonymy without saying anything about similarities while other scholars used homonyms together with other similarities in the sense of homophones. as for similarity in the sense of synonymy tabarsi did not believe in total synonymy and he referred to lexical differences as ‘farq’ or ‘foruq’ (differences). in this case he followed abuhalal askari.

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023